Politically Active Churches: Why Should They Keep Their Tax-Exempt Status

As the fight for tax fairness continues, it’s time to call out institutions that should be held accountable for their political involvement. Harvard University is under fire for allegedly being “too political” by protecting students' rights to free speech and expression. But here’s the real issue: if universities are being scrutinized for their political stances, why do politically active churches remain untouched?

Across the United States, many churches are engaging in explicit political activity—endorsing political candidates, promoting particular policies, and even using their platforms to rally behind political causes. This kind of political advocacy goes against the fundamental purpose of tax-exempt organizations and raises an important question: If universities are penalized for political engagement, why are churches with the same level of political activity allowed to keep their tax-exempt status?

Many large, influential churches have been openly involved in political debates, some even aligning with agendas such as Project 2025, endorsing specific political candidates, and actively using their influence to affect policy decisions. It’s time to ask: Why should these institutions be allowed to retain their tax-free status while others, like Harvard, are facing consequences for their political actions?

We must demand fairness and consistency in the application of the law. If political activity should result in losing tax-exempt status, then all institutions engaging in such activities must face the same consequences. No one should be above the law, not even powerful religious organizations.

Call to Action:

The time to stand up for fairness is now. If we’re going to hold universities accountable, we must hold churches and other political organizations to the same standards. Stand with us in demanding equal treatment under the law. It’s time to end the hypocrisy and protect our democracy.